"Free Energy" and Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation - by Oleg D. Jefimenko

"Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation: A Different Approach to the Theory of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields&...

"Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation: A Different Approach to the Theory of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields" Review

The book "Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation: A Different Approach to the Theory of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields"  by Oleg D. Jefimenko 

The author resurrects some 1893 work by Heaviside to postulate that gravitational fields have more in common with electromagnetic law than the repulsion of static gravitation, and that both sciences can benefit from a time-dependent treatment that illustrates causality better than Maxwell's equations. Conclusions include a force of cogravitation analogous to the magnetic force, non-instantaneous propagation of gravitation, and the existence of five (5) gravitational forces. Rejecting the idea that E and H cause each other, Jefimenko shows that mass, change in mass density, and mass currents are the origin of both the gravitation and cogravitation vectors. Highly recommended for those who want to learn fields and waves by thinking. about them Urgently relevant because of the recent detection of gravity waves -- this book will give you a background even if you disagree with it.

I was mistaken to order this book. Trusting another review, I assumed that this is the "beginning" volume for understanding Jefimenko's formulation of electromagnetic and gravitation. It isn't. If you are unused to computing with delayed (retarded) potentials, as I am, then the "warm up" book would be "Electromagnetic Retardation and the Theory of Relativity." That would be the place to start exploring Jefimenko's point of view if you have already had a good course in electromagnetic theory. Otherwise, the author's book "Electricity and Magnetism" would be the right start. This volume begins with a chapter on causality, making the point that both the electric and the magnetic field arise causally from a common ancestor, but that they do not mutually cause each other. Given his formalism, the point is fair, and I think there is no use in contesting the point. However, the two do arise together from a common source and they do act as people have always supposed they act. So, this point seems to be a matter of intellectual precision and not really too practical---for now. I think that many main-stream physicists might object that Jefimenko is splitting hairs, but to me it seems to be wrong. We begin usually with Maxwell's equations in a differential form. With blundering calculations, we find them to be Lorentz invariant. So what? Well, we end up being forced to notice that time measurements at different locations have to be synchronized more carefully than we had imagined. We get effects usually called "special relativistic." But there is a problem in that we began saying time means one thing and we end up finding it means something a little different. So, Jefimenko's extra care is needed, and not wasted. I think his way is very important and gets too little attention.


Causality between electric and magnetic fields in Maxwell's equations


Maxwell's equation not only describes light as an electromagnetic wave, but it also describes electrical and magnetic phenomena in space, which underlie the fields of electronics (electrical engineering) and quantum physics. Also, Maxwell's equation is written by four equations that follow advanced mathematics (not elementary math).

Consider the electric and magnetic relationship in the simplest way, electromagnetic waves. It is depicted as in 3D below:

Consider the electric and magnetic relationship

Maxwell's equation is a system of four equations:

Maxwell's equation is a system of four equations
Maxwell's equation

Understand Maxwell's equations at a high school level: Variable electric fields produce magnetic fields, and variable magnetic fields produce electric fields. This is best demonstrated in equations 3 and 4 (in the image above). It is the Causality between electric and magnetic fields. And the best illustration is the electromagnetic wave in the 3D image above.

  • In equation 3: the derivative of the magnetic field B over time is the electric field E
  • In equation 4: The derivative of the electric field E generates a magnetic field B on the wire with current density J. That means considering the electric current in the space

The causal relationship between the electric field E and the magnetic field B is best shown in equations 3 and 4 - Maxwell – Faraday equation and Ampère's circuital law.

For a university degree, most don't fully understand it either. Most just give formulas and briefly talk about equations. Some theoretical specializations may present the full history of Maxwell's equations, along with its physical significance. But naturally the Maxwell equation does not accurately describe reality. So it is necessary to have professors who are also "masters" of science to interpret for a false description of reality. To learn more about Maxwell's equations, along with mathematical symbols, check out the Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_equations

The causal relationship between E and B has been shown to be inaccurate. A scholar named Oleg D. Jefimenko has proved that E and B are not causal. He used the mathematics of Maxwell's own equations, along with experiment, to prove it. The proof is in the book "Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation: A Different Approach to the Theory of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields" by Oleg D. Jefimenko.


Causality, Electromagnetic Induction by Oleg D. Jefimenko and Gravitation

Comment: The author resurrects some 1893 work by Heaviside to postulate that gravitational fields have more in common with electromagnetic law than the repulsion of static gravitation, and that both sciences can benefit from a time-dependent treatment that illustrates causality better than Maxwell's equations. Conclusions include a force of cogravitation analogous to the magnetic force, non-instantaneous propagation of gravitation, and the existence of five (5) gravitational forces. Rejecting the idea that E and B cause each other, Jefimenko shows that mass, change in mass density, and mass currents are the origin of both the gravitation and cogravitation vectors. Highly recommended for those who want to learn fields and waves by thinking. about them Urgently relevant because of the recent detection of gravity waves -- this book will give you a background even if you disagree with it.

Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation A Different Approach to the Theory of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields
Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation A Different Approach to the Theory of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields - by Oleg D. Jefimenko

Highlights of the book:
  • There is no causal relationship between electric and magnetic fields
  • The science community needs to reconsider gravity - they are indispensable in power generation and transmission
  • The clear, detailed derivative of all the basic formulas and equations, and many illustrative examples make this book not only suitable for independent research but also supplementary in courses in the theory of electromagnetism and gravity
Oleg D. Jefimenko, the author of the book is a master of mathematics very knowledgeable about Maxwell, Heaviside. All the scholars knowledgeable about Maxwell, Heaviside, Nikola Tesla, Charles Proteus Steinmetz, all know that, those geniuses confirm that Ether exists. Thus, Oleg D. Jefimenko must know about Ether. But the author seems to be trying to avoid the word "Ether" in order for the book to become a publishing practice.

Gravity, electric fields and magnetic fields can all be solved by the Ether field theory. However, Ether technology will create free energy, while mainstream science does not accept free energy.

Current Ether field theory has 2 types: real and fake. The Ether field theory truly reflects reality - Nature - thus creating Ether technology. Nikola Tesla created technology that follows the "real" Ether field theory - the real Tesla technology (the technology for which Elon Musk is the fake Tesla technology). Later, many researchers rediscovered the theory of real Ether fields, typically Ken Wheeller and Eric Dollard.

"Real" Electromagnetic, Ether, Gravity, and AC generators - Tesla technology

Electric and magnetic fields are 2 fields of Ether, it is the equivalent of magnetism and dielectric, which in fact, magnetism is the dielectric is lost inertia in the flow of Ether. So what is dielectric? Dielectric is another method of Ether, when the Ether is stirred (high frequency stimulated) or need to reconcile pressure, the dielectric occurs.

"Real" electromagnetic: The dielectric and magnetism are just two sides of the same coin, they have the same nature as Ether. The same goes for electric and magnetic fields, they have the same nature as Ether fields. According to Ken Wheeller, they are the field in Ether field mechanics, a type of mechanics about pressure mediation in Ether.

For a better understanding of field theory, I recommend you read Ken's book: Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism

AC generators: One consequence of Jefimenko's "Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation: A Different Approach to the Theory of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fieldsbook is that there is no causal relationship between the kinetic energy supplied to the AC generator and the AC generator output power. Textbooks and technical books still say: The large rotor of an alternating current generator mounted on a rotating permanent magnet will create a voltage across the coil on the stator. However, there is no causal relationship between the kinetic energy supplied to the AC generator and the power of the generator.

😨 Hidden Secret of POWER GENERATION 🤔 Why does NOBODY talk about this?


Hence, the big power plants (BIG E) are still selling us free energy.

Tesla Technology - Ether energy for AC power:

🌀 Nikola Tesla's Ether Technology:
💠 Harnessing the power of back electromagnetic fields (Back EMF)
💠 Back EMF generates Lenz's Force in generator 💠 When the output energy is not affected by the Lenz (free) force, a self-powered mechanism will be established from the AC generator head to the induction motor. And the kinetic energy of the induction motor at that time was only supposed to stir the Ether by Nikola Tesla's "Rotating Magnetic Field". That's the mechanism for a Free Energy AC generator - no fuel needed - Self-powered generator.

AC generator without fuelQuick Power System Will Change Our World Forever

🌀 Tesla's Ether technology is mathematically traced:
💠 The mathematical and physical work of Oleg D. Jefimenko proved that: there is no process of converting the kinetic energy supplied to the generator into electricity. 💠 The energy comes from the establishment of the tension of the Ether by the dielectric of the metal in the Ether field.


👉Free Energy AC generator



Post a Comment

emo-but-icon

Follow Us

Hot in week

Recent

Comments

Text Widget

Connect Us

static_page